Malam tadik, my anak was excited with the state's performance in the ongoing Sukma tournament.
I told him : nang patut juak Sarawak pefom. Mun sik pefom, nang bisin urang, kerna Sukma di tempat dirik empun.
I elaborated : betaun training makey tempat (court, field, etc) yang sama, sik patut sik dapat amik peluang kerna dah biasa ngan tempat ya.
My fren, who is a former state coach, was surprised when i told him about kesanggupan a coach amik anak i dari sekolah to ferry him to training venue.
He (my son) must be good if the coach decided to do that - kata my fren.
I diam jak.
Btw, mun i sik 'stop' his involvement with the sport, maybe he represents Sarawak in Sukma this year. Wallahua'lam.
The reason i sik maok my anak continue with the sport is becoz i sik maok his education terganggu.
I dolok aktif juak membabitkan dirik with sports - not as an athlete ๐.
So dah banyak juak yang i diat and dengar on keadaan bekas atlit.
Kesian pok.
Da juak yang i usaha tulung - in my own way.
So, i sik tekejut when the former state coach madah many parents yang sik maok anak sidak too aktif in sports.
Sidak sik maok education anak-anak terganggu.
I nang paham, beribu kali paham.
Good future sik da di Sarawak / Malaysia.
Mungkin seratus tahun yang akan datang, keadaan berubah.
Tapi dalam masa terdekat tok, masih macam dolok.
Sik da good future untuk atlit.
Da banyak contoh.
Wallahua'lam.
p/s So far, brapa org atlit or bekas atlit are anak ministers, ybs, orang corporate or taikun? Honestly, i sik tauk. Please share their names / identities. Mesti ramey ndak?
No comments:
Post a Comment